Re: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk>]

Hi Folks

 

Here are Schemas (draft 4) generated with UBLish with

the corrected names and prefixes "Common Aggregate Components (CAC) for ABIEs and Common Basic Components (CBC) for BBIEs"

 

I've also amended GUID to GloballyUniqueID.

 

Apologies for posting these to [ubl] but it saves posting across lists.

 

Please report any problems. Thanks.

 

All the best

 

Steve

----- Original Message -----

From: CRAWFORD, Mark

To: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org ; UBL FPSC

Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 8:12 PM

Subject: RE: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

Stephen,

 

The two schema modules are - Common Aggregate Components (CAC) for ABIEs and Common Basic Components (CBC) for BBIEs.

 

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 1:58 PM
To: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org; UBL FPSC
Subject: Re: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

Tim

 

Thanks for pointing this out. I think there may be a

mistake or two along these lines in the NDRules

document. Both terms are used there. Maybe it should

just be '..Components' consistently. I'll change the

 names I've used and the prefixes will have to change too (which includes in the samples and the FP specs -

hence my copying in FPSC here).

 

All the best

 

Steve

----- Original Message -----

From: Tim McGrath

To: Michael Dill

Cc: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org ; mcrawford@lmi.org

Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:54 PM

Subject: Re: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

it appears that the names of these should be CommonAggregateComponents (cac:) and CommonBasicComponents (cbc:) - I am not sure where stephen got these names from?

stephen, can you change these in the next draft.

PS We only have Draft L to go on, but I believe that Draft M only has editorial changes.

Michael Dill wrote:

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: dill [mailto:dill@gefeg.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Februar 2004 12:26
An: Mcrawford@Lmi. Org; ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org; Stephen Green
Cc: Mavis Cournane; Lisa-Aeon
Betreff: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

> These keep the rules about splitting reusable into CommonAggregateType (cat:) and CommonBasicType (cbt:).

Hi Mark,

please help. I'm confused. We are preparing the XSD generation from the models. I'd like to be in line with NDR version M. Where I can find the below mentioned rules in the NDR document? Or shall I consider these rules just as an intermediate step and they must not be used?

Thanks,

Michael

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk]
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2004 07:36
An: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Chin Chee-Kai
Betreff: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

 

As promised here are the Schemas, all valid, which I

have just generated using the UBLish tool - many

thanks to our friend Chin Chee-Kai (cc'd here).

 

These keep the rules about splitting reusable into

CommonAggregateType (cat:) and CommonBasicType

(cbt:). Please would someone point out any rules

they don't keep which they should.

 

All the best

 

Steve 

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

UBL-1_0-schemas-draft-4.zip