[no subject]

There are serious recommendations against it's use being expressed by
several groups
outside of UBL. Marty has stated that there is no other way to do what is
necessary
for the codelist methodology. This concerns me - are we trying to do
something more
than is actually necessary since other groups and NDRSC have confidently
deemed it
something to be ruled out? I have read very few 'pros' for the use of
substitutionGroups
in particular and a great many 'cons'. Can others verify this?

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: <jon.bosak@sun.com>
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:03 PM
Subject: [ubl] Use ubl list for cross-SC discussions


> UBL TC,
>
> Resolution of remaining issues leading to the generation of 1.0
> schemas is being seriously hindered by multiple discussions taking
> place on separate SC lists and, worse yet, on ad hoc private
> lists.  This has to stop.  Please use the main ubl list for any
> matter that crosses SC boundaries.
>
> Jon
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php
.
>
>