[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Schema Review
Mark, Good point for the final release; however, I believe the relative paths are being used for now to facilitate our validation (e.g. so we can review them without being connected to the internet). Mike -----Original Message----- From: CRAWFORD, Mark [mailto:MCRAWFORD@lmi.org] Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10 01 To: Ubl List (E-mail) Subject: [ubl] Schema Review Another Comment before I run off to the Dr - The NDR has had this rule for almost as long as I can remember: "To ensure consistency and clarity, each schema location must be complete. To identify schema modules relative paths are not allowed. Although this may cause a problem with mirror sites, this is outside the scope of UBL. [ATD6] Each xsd:schemaLocation attribute declaration URL MUST contain an absolute path." However, relative paths are resplendent throughout the schema in violation of this rule. Mark To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]