RE: [ubl] Meeting Minutes UBL Joint meeting Mar 23rd 2004

[Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>]

>  9) We only need cbcs for each "BBIE property" (PropertyTerm+Rep.Term) -
>     not a cbc for each qualified BBIEs.  although i am then not sure how
>     we can name any qualified BBIEs.
>   AI - Mike G -research and give example(s) for discussion Wed.


It was requested that I use the following items from the CBC schema as an example:

   <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>
   <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>

Reference:

    wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc [Line 1848]: BBIE properties are represented with complex types.

    Rule [CTD5][Line 1858] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType content model xsd:base attribute
                           value MUST be the ccts:CCT of the unspecialised or specialised UBL
                           datatype as appropriate. 

Example:

    What would be expected in the CBC schema would be a type 'StreetNameType' with base="udt:NameType".

    Then we would have:
   
	  <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="StreetNameType"/>

    In the CAC Schema (or wherever), where you need 'AdditionalStreetName', it would be declared as:

	  <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="cbc:StreetNameType"/>