Re: [ubl] Draft 10.1 Schema Review - CBC Schema

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

i agree, this is a signifcant change it structure to the CBC and CAC 
+document schemas.

David, are you aware that this was requested for draft 10?


Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote:

>Greetings,
>
>It looks to me as if the CBC schema has not changed much (if any).
>
>We still have:
>
>    <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>
>    <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>
>
>
>We should have:
>
>    <xsd:complexType name="StreetNameType">
>        <xsd:simpleContent>
>            <xsd:extension base="udt:NameType"></xsd:extension>
>        </xsd:simpleContent>
>    </xsd:complexType>
>
>    <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="StreetNameType"/>
>
>
>In the CAC Schema (or wherever), we should see declarations such as:
>
>    <xsd:element ref="cbc:StreetName"/>
>
>    <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="cbc:StreetNameType"/>
>
>
>Reference from NDR (wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc):
>
>    [Line 1848]: BBIE properties are represented with complex types.
>
>    [CTD3] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType definition content model MUST use the xsd:simpleContent element.
>
>    [CTD4] Every ccts:BBIEProperty ComplexType content model xsd:simpleContent element MUST consist of an  xsd:extension element. 
>
>    [CTD5] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType content model  xsd:base attribute value MUST be the ccts:CCT of the unspecialised or specialised UBL datatype as appropriate. 
>
>-----
>
>Thank You,
>Mike Grimley 
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>  
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160