Re: [ubl] Schema/model bugs

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

[MCRAWFORD@lmi.org:]

| Why would we not want to be conformant to XSD?  Specifically note
| the title of Part 2 is - "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes" not Data
| Types.  Note also that the NDR also calls for these to be called
| Datatypes.

I didn't have an opinion on this -- I was just pointing out that
the schemas and spreadsheets were out of sync with regard to these
names.

If "Datatypes" is acceptable, then we can leave the schemas alone
and just change this in the spreadsheet.

Jon

   Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:15:24 -0400
   From: <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>

   >  - In schemas: need to change UBL-SpecialisedDatatypes to
   >    UBL-SpecialisedDataTypes
   > 
   >  - In schemas: need to change UBL-UnspecialisedDatatypes to
   >    UBL-UnspecialisedDataTypes
   > 
   >  - In models: need to change UnSpecialisedDataTypes to
   >    UnspecialisedDataTypes

   Why would we not want to be conformant to XSD?  Specifically note the title of Part 2 is - "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes" not Data Types.  Note also that the NDR also calls for these to be called Datatypes.

   To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.