[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Naming of the Order Response document type
Tim McGrath wrote: > At a recent presentation on UBL I was asked if we were aware of the > issues conerning naming our document type "Order Response". > The questioner expressed a concern that there were global trade > practice implications and we would be better to call this an > "Acknowledgement of Receipt of Order". Apparently this was suggested > by some authority in the United States. > > Does anyone know anything about this matter? I cannot imagine what > this means but I committed to get a response from the TC - so i would > appreciate any input. > Acknowledgment of receipt is not a business message but a signal that does not include a business document. Please see ebXML BPSS for further definition. The acknowledgment of receipt signal indicates the receipt of a request that has passed a syntactic check. It does not indicate the request (in this case order request) has been handed over for processing or is being processed. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]