Re: AW: [ubl] UBL pending item h.2

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

I can see where your logic is coming from here David, but this argument 
leaves us no way of specifying whether an ASBIE is mandatory or optional.

We currently use the cardinaility of 0 to show optionality.

As anee says we will probably find some more of these defintion errors, 
which relate back to when we decided to make many associations optional 
- but forgot to change their definitions.


Michael Dill wrote:

>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
>Von: David Kruppke [mailto:dill2@gefeg.com]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 17:55
>An: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
>Betreff: [ubl] UBL pending item h.2
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>h.2 concerns the definition of the ASBIE OrderReference,
>DespatchDocumentReference and
>ReceiptDocumentReference in ABIE Invoice.
>
>The current definition is the following:
>
>"Provides a means of associating an Invoice with one or more Orders(Despatch
>Advices/Receipt Advices)"
>
>I think it is OK to say "one or more" although the cardinality is 0..n. If
>the ASBIE is used then it associates the invoice to at least one Order,
>DespatchDocumentReference or ReceiptDocumentReference. Otherwise it is not
>used. It cannot associate the invoice to zero references.
>
>Please compare the definitions of ReceiptAdvice/OrderReference and
>DespatchAdvice/OrderReference.
>
>
>Please answer to kruppke@gefeg.com, too.
>
>
>Regards, David Kruppke
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
>OASIS TC), go to
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php
>
>  
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160