[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes from the Pacific Call (and call for urgent action from XML schema testers)
Greetings Folks
Tim in a report of the Pacific Call 2004-09-01/02
wrote
1.3 Revised schemas for Unspecialized Data Types: I haven't tested the Schemas with regard to XML/XSD syntax (other
than validating with XML Spy 2004)
but I have performed the following test with 100% PASS of each part of the
test.
For each document Schema in turn I generated (with
a 'wizard' of XML Spy 2004 Enterprise on Windows XP) a sample
instance
with all elements and all atributes of UBL and with
generated, valid data *using the cd2 XSDRT
Schemas*.
For each instance I performed a standard validation
with XML Spy 2004 (please note this thros an error with XML Spy v5
which
those present in Copenhagen F2F with XSD knowledge
all believed to be a 'bug' in the product and not the Schemas - due
to
the use of restriction in the SDT Schema).
RESULT: ALL VALID (there is sometimes a problem with the size of the
OrderResponse
full sample instance but this merely required care
to ensure the generator had finished generating before running the
validation).
For each instance I changed the Schema location to
point to the Schemas last sent by Gefeg (including the UDT Schema
just
sent out by Tim) on 2004-08-24. I then revalidated.
RESULT: ALL VALID
I attach a copy of the test instances.
This is not so much to test the XSD syntax so much
as to ensure that no model change has occurred since the cd2
Schemas.
It also confirms correctness in quite a few other
areas.
Many thanks to David / Gefeg for this Schema
generation work.
All the best
Stephen Green
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]