[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: My original comments on aligning with ATG2 CCT schemas
Following the meetings this week I have been asked to resend my original comments on the alignment of ATG2 CCT schemas and UBL 1.0 ones. The message can be found at: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00000.html However, some of this is now history as the ATG2 group have been revising their draft schemas. for exmaple, i have been informed that some of these comments (such as the naming of attributes) are resolved. My personal opinion is that we should aim to have one definitive set of schemas (owned by ATG2) for UBL 2.0. The caveat on this is that we have to support backward compatibility with UBL 1.0 documents. So in the interim we need to work towards convergence both with the ATG2 (and OAG) schemas as they develop. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services (coming soon from MIT Press) http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]