[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: [tc-announce] UBL NDR specification submitted for OASIS Standard
FYI >Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:10:00 -0800 >To: tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org,members@lists.oasis-open.org >From: James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> >Subject: [tc-announce] UBL NDR specification submitted for OASIS Standard > >OASIS members: > >The OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC has submitted the UBL >Naming and Design Rules v1.0 revision 1c, an approved Committee Draft, to >be considered as an OASIS Standard. The TC's submission is attached below. > >In accordance with the OASIS Technical Committee Process, the >specification has already gone through a 30 day public review >period. >(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200409/msg00001.html) >OASIS members now have until the 15th of December to familiarize >themselves with the submission below. OASIS members should give their >input on this question to the voting representative of their organization. > >By the 16th of the month we will send out a Call For Vote to the voting >representatives of the OASIS member organizations, who will have until the >end of the month to cast their ballots on whether this Committee Draft >should be approved as an OASIS Standard. > >The normative TC Process for approval of Committee Drafts as OASIS >Standards is found at >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standard > >Any statements related to the IPR of this specification are posted at >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/ipr.php > >~ James Bryce Clark >~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS >~ +1 978 667 5115 x 203 central offiice > >ITEMS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE OASIS TC PROCESS FOR STANDARDIZATION OF >COMMITTEE DRAFTS > >1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, together >with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of which must >be written using approved OASIS templates. > > The UBL NDR Committee Draft is located at > >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/10323/cd-UBL-NDR-1.0Rev1c.pdf > Documentation is included as part of the Committee Draft. > >2. A clear English-language summary of the specification. > > See the Introduction of the Committee Draft. > >3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to similar >work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations. > > The UBL NDR document specifies naming and design rules and guidelines > for the construction of XML components for the UBL vocabulary. It is > normative with regard to UBL 1.0 schemas and is also expected to be > useful to other XML schema developers, in particular those implementing > ebXML Core Components. > >4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they >are successfully using the specification consistently with the OASIS IPR >Policy. > > The following OASIS member organizations have certified to the TC that > they are successfully using UBL 1.0 and, by implication, the UBL Naming > and Design Rules: > > Sun Microsystems > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00037.html > > Hitachi Systems & Services, Ltd. > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00038.html > > OSS Nokalva > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00039.html > > Denmark Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00041.html > > Center for Document Engineering, University of California at Berkeley > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00040.html > > University of Hong Kong > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00048.html > > Korea CALS/EC Association > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00059.html > >5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public >review period, along with its resolution. > > Comments submitted regarding the UBL NDR CD review of September / > October 2004, together with their disposition by the TC, can be found at > >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/9945/UBL-NDR-CD-1.0-comments.xls > >6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the specification as >a Committee Draft. > > Results of the NDR CD ballot can be found at > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/ballot.php?id=592 > >7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any earlier >attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, together >with the originating TC's response to each comment. > > The UBL Naming and Design Rules have not previously been submitted > for OASIS standardization. > >8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC. > > The UBL comment archive is located at > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/ > >9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all members of the >TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR Policy. > > Members of the TC were formally notified by email in the message > archived at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200407/msg00058.html > >10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more >TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Draft, or >certification by the chair that no minority reports exist. > > No minority reports were submitted. > >Submitted by the OASIS UBL TC chair, Jon Bosak (jon.bosak@sun.com)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]