RE: [ubl] Fwd: [tc-announce] UBL NDR specification submitted for OASIS

Subject: RE: [ubl] Fwd: [tc-announce] UBL NDR specification submitted for OASIS Standard

     FYI

>Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:10:00 -0800
>To: tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org,members@lists.oasis-open.org
>From: James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
>Subject: [tc-announce] UBL NDR specification submitted for OASIS Standard
>
>OASIS members:
>
>The OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC has submitted the UBL
>Naming and Design Rules v1.0 revision 1c, an approved Committee Draft, to
>be considered as an OASIS Standard. The TC's submission is attached below.
>
>In accordance with the OASIS Technical Committee Process, the
>specification has already gone through a 30 day public review
>period.
>(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200409/msg00001.html)
>OASIS members now have until the 15th of December to familiarize
>themselves with the submission below. OASIS members should give their
>input on this question to the voting representative of their organization.
>
>By the 16th of the month we will send out a Call For Vote to the voting
>representatives of the OASIS member organizations, who will have until the
>end of the month to cast their ballots on whether this Committee Draft
>should be approved as an OASIS Standard.
>
>The normative TC Process for approval of Committee Drafts as OASIS
>Standards is found at
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standard
>
>Any statements related to the IPR of this specification are posted at
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/ipr.php
>
>~   James Bryce Clark
>~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>~   +1 978 667 5115 x 203 central offiice
>
>ITEMS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE OASIS TC PROCESS FOR STANDARDIZATION OF
>COMMITTEE DRAFTS
>
>1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, together
>with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of which must
>be written using approved OASIS templates.
>
>     The UBL NDR Committee Draft is located at
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/10323/cd-UBL-NDR-1.0Rev1c.pdf
>     Documentation is included as part of the Committee Draft.
>
>2. A clear English-language summary of the specification.
>
>     See the Introduction of the Committee Draft.
>
>3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to similar
>work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations.
>
>     The UBL NDR document specifies naming and design rules and guidelines
> for the construction of XML components for the UBL vocabulary. It is
> normative with regard to UBL 1.0 schemas and is also expected to be
> useful to other XML schema developers, in particular those implementing
> ebXML Core Components.
>
>4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they
>are successfully using the specification consistently with the OASIS IPR
>Policy.
>
>    The following OASIS member organizations have certified to the TC that
> they are successfully using UBL 1.0 and, by implication, the UBL Naming
> and Design Rules:
>
>    Sun Microsystems
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00037.html
>
>    Hitachi Systems & Services, Ltd.
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00038.html
>
>    OSS Nokalva
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00039.html
>
>    Denmark Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00041.html
>
>    Center for Document Engineering, University of California at Berkeley
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00040.html
>
>    University of Hong Kong
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00048.html
>
>    Korea CALS/EC Association
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00059.html
>
>5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public
>review period, along with its resolution.
>
>    Comments submitted regarding the UBL NDR CD review of September /
> October 2004, together with their disposition by the TC, can be found at
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/9945/UBL-NDR-CD-1.0-comments.xls
>
>6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the specification as
>a Committee Draft.
>
>    Results of the NDR CD ballot can be found at
>    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/ballot.php?id=592
>
>7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any earlier
>attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, together
>with the originating TC's response to each comment.
>
>     The UBL Naming and Design Rules have not previously been submitted
> for OASIS standardization.
>
>8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC.
>
>     The UBL comment archive is located at
>     http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/
>
>9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all members of the
>TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR Policy.
>
>     Members of the TC were formally notified by email in the message
> archived at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200407/msg00058.html
>
>10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more
>TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Draft, or
>certification by the chair that no minority reports exist.
>
>     No minority reports were submitted.
>
>Submitted by the OASIS UBL TC chair, Jon Bosak (jon.bosak@sun.com)

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.

ubl message