Re: [ubl-ssc] Minutes of SSC Call 17th March 2005

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>]

Amendment: I think, for extension, the
redeclared InvoiceLineType would need an extra
intermediate name since it would otherwise
appear twice in the same namespace.
This might then need a new Naming and Design Rule
for the intermediate complexType name.

[original message is at
  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ssc/200503/msg00013.html ]

>>> "Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk> 03/18/05 13:05 PM >>>

...    possibly here a redeclaration of the 1.0 elements and global complexTypes under the 1.1 namespace  ...

	<xsd:element name="InvoiceLine" type="InvoiceLineType"/>
	...
               redeclaration of the InvoiceLineType
               ...
               <!--  extension of InvoiceLineType -->
               <xsd:complexType name="InvoiceLineType">
		<xsd:complexContent>
			<xsd:extension base="InvoiceLineType">
				<xsd:sequence>
					<xsd:element ref="cbc:InspectionDate" minOccurs="0"/>
				</xsd:sequence>
			</xsd:extension>
		</xsd:complexContent>
	</xsd:complexType>

... further redeclarations of the 1.0 elements and global complexTypes under the 1.1 namespace  ...