Re: [ubl] [ver] a prototype that works

[<MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

Title: Re: [ubl] [ver] a prototype that works

But does this mean everything is given a version update - even if it doesn't change? That is terribly monolithic. I would prefer we import static types and define new or changed types.
Mark R. Crawford
Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
--
LMI Government Consulting
2000 Corporate Ridge
McLean, VA 22102-7805
703.917.7177 Phone
703.655.4810 Wireless
The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater
www.lmi.org

-----Original Message-----
From: jon.bosak@sun.com <jon.bosak@sun.com>
To: kruppke@gefeg.com <kruppke@gefeg.com>; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tue Apr 19 12:39:36 2005
Subject: Re: [ubl] [ver] a prototype that works

[MCRAWFORD@lmi.org:]

| David,
|
| Could you please define what you mean by redeclare? 

He means just issuing a completely redone set of schemas (rather
than importing anything from 1.0).

Jon

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php