[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [ver] recommendation
There was a versioning team meeting yesterday with Arofan, Tony and myself attending. Arofan intends to send me for fowarding to this list today a written-up recommendation agreed on the call. Unfortunately I'm having trouble receiving emails at the moment so I'm unsure when I'm likely to get it - hence this message. The recommendation will define two options: one for a 'redeclaration' of all BIEs (as SSC took as its default) and one for polymorphic Schemas. I was to add a few suggestions for possible NDR amendments for the first option and add a few notes about the second. In case I don't get the paper out for reveiw until later today I'd like to give those notes about option 2 here. There would need, we agreed, to be one particular NDR change for the major versions which would be to make EVERY element global (NOT making an exception for IDs and Codes). This would allow the necessary functionality in an importing minor version or customisation Schema (along the lines we recommend for option 2). I believe we should definitely make this change in the next version of UBL Schemas since even if we decide not to use the polymorphic design for minor versions we would be allowing customisers to use it (and I believe this was a requirement for the considerations of the versioning team and an essential aspect of the NDR). This, I believe, would require the next version to be a major version. Then there would be time to consider the design for the version after that but our recommendation option 2 gives a workable design to allow the polymorphic functionality for minor versions as well as providing a reliable design along the same lines for customised Schemas. This time could be used testing further details such as how multiple minor versions can be managed with regard to imports and whether to create a new element and type for every BIE or just for those which are changed, then for refining the NDRules accordingly (and possibly adding more detail to the Customisation Methodology paper). We agreed to this in the meeting yesterday as our recommendation to the TC. Many thanks Stephen Green
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]