RE: [ubl] ACC? AW: [ubl] PLENARY REPORT FROM THE UBL TC MEETING IN HANGZHOU 9 MAY - 13 MAY 2005

[<MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

> Just noting that the original issue seems not to be whether a 
> document has BBIEs just below the top level but whether these 
> BBIEs belong to the document namespace or to the common or 
> core namespaces (common basic components).
> In other words if they belonged to the
> document namespace then they would be
> "not in the Common Basic Components".
> This is the UBL 1.0 problem I think is to be addressed.

It seems to me this is exactly why we created the internal schema
modules - ABIEs and BBIEs that were unique could be declared in the
document namespace since the internal schema module resides in that
space.  

Mark