>Remember that we are discussing substitution
groups (and possible
>alternatives to the same) as a code list extension
>next week's Atlantic TC call. Given that Mark Crawford
>unable to attend, it would be good to have as much information
>possible (including the outcome of discussions with
>Thompson) posted to this list prior to that meeting, preferably
>the beginning of the week.
Remember that our discussions on the
use of substitution groups within our UBL NDR needs to focus on what our
requirements are for developing UBL normative schema from our models for
vote by the TC - to include UBL developed code lists. Customizer
requirements are left to the extension methodology.