[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups
> >The extensible bit is in the vocabulary and how customizers use that > >vocabulary and our normative schema. Not in how we create our > >normative schema. > > The extensible bit is only in a vocabulary if that vocabulary > is extensible. > It seems to me that you're arguing not so much for > extensibility but reusability. The vocabulary is extensible - through the creation of new context specific BIEs in the base model. It is also extensible through customization outside of the standards process between trading partner individuals and groups. > That said, as I've argued before, substitution groups are not > as extensible a mechanism as use of xsd:any. Sure. Lets have two types in UBL. Any and Thing with unlimited content models. Very extensible - and totally useless for setting STANDARDS. Regards, Mark
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]