[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups
>The Extensibility in XML comes from being able to create multiple >vocabularies from a single syntax - not from recasting types. That is a >feature of XSD. this is arguable. One common usage of extensibility in the context of xml is the extension of a known dialect of xml with some other namespace (often rdf-xml because those rdf guys are always running around trying to get it in everything) http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Toolbox.html gives examples. This document doesn't seem to be focussed on reuse of schemas as providing some sort of extensibility, nor does it seem to presume that by having made a format in a language with extensibility in its name the format is by default extensible. Regards, Bryan Rasmussen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]