[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 17|18 October 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING 00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 18 OCTOBER 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Betty Harvey G. Ken Holman Andy Schoka Kumar Sivaraman Sylvia Webb STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm SW: X12: 5-10 February 2006, Seattle; 4-9 June 2006, Chicago; 24-29 September 2006, Boston. Liaison report: X12 SW: Dan Kazzaz has already initiated discussions with Dick Raman; he wants X12 models and schemas to be interoperable with UBL, CEFACT, and other international standards. AGREED that KS will back up SW as the UBL liaison to X12. Liaison report: Tax XML TC SW: The discussion between TimM and the Tax XML TC is scheduled for 9 November. Liaison report: ebBP TC JB: Note again the request for input regarding logical documents. Subcommittee report: HISC GKH: Still on hold pending completion of code list work. Subcommittee report: SBSC JB: Still waiting for schemas. Subcommittee report: PSC SW: Not on track to meet deadline. No meeting this morning, and was not able to dial in to the Friday F2F. Reported back on some errors still in the spreadsheets; there is still much debugging to do there. Have not had an opportunity to attempt import of any of the other models, but can tell that there will be questions at the least. Problem: An unintended consequence of adopting the ATG UDT is that the data model is not compatible with the UBL UDT model, so we will need a UBL QDT that matches the ATG UDT. This would have been an SSC task, but TonyC, SG, AH are all having problems attending. JB: Maybe an ad hoc team can attack this problem. Will raise in the Atlantic call. Subcommittee report: TSC AS: All-day F2F in Singapore 20 October to review and finalize transport content. Have suggested a call at the end to get a summary but have received no response. Team report: Code lists GKH: Good message from TonyC, much appreciated. Have found inconsistencies in 1.0. Things are progressing. But note that my work is on the examples for the supplementary materials, not on the structures for the enumerated code lists. Question: are we going with the UBL 1.0 code list structure for the code lists that were in UBL 1.0? Or do we use the structure of the code lists that we have agreed to adopt from ATG2? JB: We need to review the decisions we made in Ottawa and discuss this in the Atlantic call. Review of Atlantic and Europe/Asia calls GKH/SW: OK with the conclusion of the CEFACT discussion. Schedule review: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200510/msg00042.html JB: Just the core; still have to do a schedule for the supplementary materials. ACTION ITEM REVIEW ACTION: SW to send CCTS, TBG17, other CEFACT schedules Done. ACTION: TM to document the spreadsheet structure and format by the first week of October. This means a prose description of each column in the spreadsheets that we are now using. (From Atlantic call) To be completed by 10/14. SW: Haven't seen this yet. ACTION: JB to revise the UBL 2.0 schedule to separate the core 2.0 package from the informative materials. Core done; informative pending. THIS MEETING GKH and BH are in Manhattan this week and will check out the rooms at 101 Park Avenue that we're thinking of using for the January F2F. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]