[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: SV: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem
Hi Stephen Yes there will be changes apart from the definitions. A digital signature will be added to all documents, applacation response will be alligned with accountResponse so it can replace this document, Document reference will appear as an individual document (as well as an ABIE) and there are some errors (omissions), partikular to the partytype, we need to correct. Kind Regards Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk] Sendt: 28. november 2005 18:36 Til: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: Re: SV: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem Hi Peter, Thanks for clarifying this. Will there be changes to the model apart from the defintions though? If not the SBS work could perhaps begin. All the best Steve >>> Peter Larsen Borresen <plb@itst.dk> 28/11/05 11:32:25 >>> Hi Stephen I just want to make clear that my recently generated schemas was for the use of the Procument group only (and Betty). Mark is about to review the definitions for the ABIE's and the schemas will not be released to the list before this is done. Therefore I saw no reason for including documentation with the schemas. Kind regards Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk] Sendt: 25. november 2005 12:47 Til: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: ubl-ssc@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem Greetings My action item was to look into how to fix the Core Components Parameters Schema problem. Attached is the original report from Altova identifying the problem and it does indicate that the missing Defintion elements in UBL 1.0 were in the codelist schema CCTS metadata documentation areas. The 2.0 spreadsheets do contain the Definition data so the solution appears to be to ensure that the data is included by the generator in the 2.0 codelist schemas as populated Defintion elements. Peter's recently mailed schemas did not include documentation (xsdrt schemas) so I couldn't check whether the generator does this already. I notice, though, that the schemas Peter sent do import the CCP schemas and the Atlantic meeting this week seemed to conclude that this has to be changed too. To summarise: The generator tool should 1. ensure that the ccts:Definition elements are included in all the schemas (including the codelist schemas) in 2.0 - the data should be found in the QDT spreadsheet 2. no longer import the CCP schema into the other UBL schemas but still include the CCP schema in the output package (updated CCP schema attached). All the best Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]