[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 12|13 December 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING 00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 13 DECEMBER 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Stephen Green Tim McGrath (vice chair) Sylvia Webb STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm None. Subcommittee report: SBSC SG: SBS 1.0 package including the ebBP work has been uploaded with a notice to the ubl and ubl-dev lists, now waiting to see if anyone comments over the holiday. JB: We start the TC approval and review process immediately after the break. Liaison report: UN/CEFACT JB: The next team meeting will take place 11 January. Team report: Code Lists SW: Regarding JB's question about missing metadata: I don't find anything in the NDRs that requires it. JB: If we don't get precise information on what needs to be added by the time of the Atlantic call Wednesday, we'll have to go with the 1.0 enum format for this round of schema generation. Subcommittee report: PSC, TSC TM: We thought we'd frozen PSC, but not quite; will resolve today or tomorrow. We've had an editorial pass through procurement content and have changed some definitions; the PSC and TSC spreadsheets have been brought together, so everything is now in one place. Mods to the PSC content will finish this week, then we'll hand over all the spreadsheets to BH for schema generation this weekend. SW: We will need Q/A of the schemas against the NDRs. JB: That will have to be part of the first public review cycle. What about GUIDs? SW: Do have a solution for that, but it hasn't been implemented yet. SG: Will we have ODF versions of the spreadsheets? JB: Yes, I'll generate those at the end of package assembly. Assembly will begin as soon as BH has generated the schemas. TM: You will get a package that includes the UML models and the extended process scenarios next week. We are upgrading the class diagrams to apply the CCTS profile using the methods developed in Austria and implemented in Australia. This is the same method used in SBS and that we hope will be used by CEFACT in the future. SG: Can file names be changed in EF configuration, or does it require programming? SW: Can be changed in configuration. JB: Should we include generated UML diagrams like the ones that Dave Carlson provided for 1.0? TM: These are less useful now that we have better input diagrams. Tools like XML Spy provide a tree view. JB: Let's think about this when we're starting to plan out the support package. SG: ASN.1? JB: I believe PT decided that this wasn't needed in the first review cycle. TM: Our focus should be on the semantics and the correctness of the NDR implementation. Review of Atlantic call No comments. ACTION ITEM REVIEW ACTION: SG and SW to create a UBL UDT spreadsheet that describes everything in the ATG2 UDT schema, ignoring what UBL currently has for UDT and QDT, and then create the UBL QDT using the same structure. SW: First draft sent to list; will send finalized version next week when back in office. ACTION: SG and SW to manually update the CC parameter schema. Done. ACTION: JB to remember to include the CC parameter schema in the review package. OTHER BUSINESS TM: We need to schedule a session at the January f2f with USDOT regarding scheduling and requirements. ACTION: JB to ask for other Manhattan agenda items on the list. ACTION: SG to ask govdex for differences between the non-normative spreadsheets and the normative definitions in SBS 1.0 (these were handcrafted, and apparently there are some accidental differences between the two). Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]