[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Formal public comment: Testa (4)
We are in receipt of the following public comment, which should be added to the issues list by the PSC. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/200603/msg00057.html Jon ================================================================== Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:22:25 +0000 From: comment-form@oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-comment] Public Comment To: ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org Comment from: veronique.testa@cegedim.fr Name: Testa Veronique Title : Project Manager Organization: Cegedim UBL 2.0 / Invoice Compare to UBL 1.0 AllowanceCharge/cbc:Amount is required. The problem is that an Allowance may have been negociated by Percent (not by Amount) and in this case, the Invoice may contains the Allowance in Percent... Both may be transmitted but also either one or other.. Suggest to make AllowanceCharge/cbc:Amount optional Thx & Regards
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]