[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Revised minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 29 March 2006
I neglected to log Tony as a participant; nothing else is changed. Jon ================================================================== REVISED MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING 16:00 - 18:00 UTC WEDNESDAY 29 MARCH 2006 ATTENDANCE Peter Borresen Jon Bosak (chair) Tony Coates Mavis Cournane Betty Harvey Zarella Rendon Andy Schoka Kumar Sivaraman Paul Thorpe Sylvia Webb STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm PB: The Northern Europe group meets 20-21 April in London. Subcommittee and team updates to Pacific call status reports None. Review of Pacific call JB: Prepare to see a draft agreement with UN/CEFACT for discussion next week. [N.B.: This was overoptimistic; OASIS still has to sign off on this before I can make it publicly visible by putting it in front of the TC.] BRUSSELS UBL TC MEETING PB: The Northern European group will fund a room for meeting Thursday 5/25 in the hotel, but they need to know which hotel. Will meet 11 April with CEN/ISSS to begin making arrangements and check out the facility. MC: Participants must understand that Thursday 5/25 is a full working day; it's just not being held at CEN/CENELEC due to the holiday. How many people plan to attend? JB: So far we have: Professor Kim Paul Thorpe (beginning Tuesday) Sylvia Webb Peter Borresen and one other person from Denmark Martin Forsberg Mavis Cournane (acting chair) Stephen Green Tu-Thu, staying at the NH Hotel Mark Leitch AS: Hank van M. from TBG3 may attend as an observer, and Dominique may also. ACTION: JB to check with Professor Kim. ISSUES LIST ??: TM will be entering all TSC and PSC comments no later than Friday. ACTION: JB to enter a couple of issues not belonging to any SC. JB: We recognize that a few issues might come in afterwards. ACTION: JB to enter into the minutes the email address of Alain Dechamps, our host for the Brussels meeting. [So here it is: alain.dechamps@cenorm.be] ACTION: PB to check out facilities for our May meeting in Brussels on his visit to CEN/CENELEC 11 April. Hotels: Holiday Inn has high speed internet (SW is staying there); Argus has free wireless in each room and is close to the meeting site; sounds like the Argus is our default hotel. AGREED to put Brussels meeting planning on the continuing agenda for the next few Atlantic meetings. ACTION ITEM REVIEW ACTION: JB to contact MartyB regarding possible code list contributions to the NDR. Move item to Pacific to discuss with GKH. We note that Marty proposed a particular structure for code list metadata. ACTION: TC to study BR's revised [extensibility] proposal and comment on the proposal; TC to think about NVDL and share comments with the group. See below. NDR WORK SESSION MC: GKH looked at NVDL, discussed it with BR, and asked BR to provided and XSD example, which he did. MC and MG have no problem with using NVDL as one way (but not *the* way) to provide for processing of schema extensions. JB: I'm coming to the view that we have to have the document-level and line item-level extension areas proposed by BR. Then people can use Schematron or NVDL or whatever they want to provide the processing. Hope to have a proposal to you shortly. PB: BR's proposal will encourage people to use the UBL namespace itself. SW: We [GEFEG] don't have a position on that or the code list methodology, but we need a final version of the checklist. MC: We've had it out for review the last three weeks and received no feedback. PB: There is a request from PSC to use an attribute at the doc level to specify version, etc.; is that included? MC: Look at the NDR! ACTION: PB to look at the NDR and say whether a change is needed. MC: We already decided that customization cannot impact NDR; the code list team needs to comment if any change is needed, but we think we're finished. PB: The rule prohibiting xsd:any would have to change. SW: Understood. We did review the NDR in detail and have no changes. The comment to the NDR team [from Are Berg requesting implementation of the extension areas] needs to be noted. MC: MG and I have been going through the schemas [q/a against NDR] and will be done end of next week; then on to the prose of the NDR doc. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]