Re: [ubl] NDR 2.0 ELD8

[Mavis Cournane <mavis.cournane@cognitran.com>]

Hi Juerg
could you verify which version of the NDR document you are looking at. 
There is no ELD8 (or anything with that rule) in the latest draft NDR 
document from May 25th 2006 that is available in the UBL document 
archive.

Regards
Mavis
On 20 Jun 2006, at 23:28, juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The UBL 2.0 CBC xsd file made available a while ago does not seem to 
> adhere to ELD8:
>
> ELD8: Global elements declared for Qualified BBIE Properties must be 
> of the same type as its corresponding Unqualified BBIE Property. (i.e. 
> Property Term + Representation Term.)
>
> The CBC has an equal number of elements and complex Types, and all 
> elements are based on the like-named complex Type. (Unlike UBL 1.0)
>
> Is ELD8 obsolete, or the CBC an error?
>
> A separate question about ELD8 when implemented as shown in UBL 1.0: 
> Here's an example:
> Assume a is the property term (PT)qualifier
> b the PT poss. noun,
> c the PT prim. noun.
>
> Asumme in the model there is no instance of b,c without a qualifier.
>
> Why is a complex Type and an element created in CBC for b,c, which 
> incidentally are not used anywhere in CAC or document schemas? Are 
> these not surplus?
>
> Many thanks in advance
> Juerg