Re: [ubl] IND7 UBLVersionID

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

you are correct juerg.  i suspect this was down to me.  when we transferred the defintion of UBLVersionID, SubsetID and ProfileID to the spreadsheet models they all were specified as 0..1 and this got generated in the schemas.

what we now need to decide is whether the changing of UBLVersionID to minOccurs=1 constitutes a significant change.  If so then we may have to let this pass for UBL 2.0 (and make a note in the NDRs to this effect) and fix it for 2.1.


juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz wrote:

Hi Brian,

Thank you for noticing my mix-up when typing: What I really meant, IMHO it SHOULD be minoccurs=1, seeing IND7, but it is minoccurs=0 in the latest release package.

Regards
Juerg>
  

----------
From: 	Bryan  Rasmussen[SMTP:BRS@ITST.DK]
Sent: 	Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:05:01 PM
To: 	Juerg Tschumperlin; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: 	SV: [ubl] IND7 UBLVersionID
Auto forwarded by a Rule

    

How is minOccurs=1 incompatible with the element MUST exist? Incompatibility would be minOccurs of 0 wouldn't it?

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz [mailto:juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz]
Sendt: 27. juli 2006 06:35
Til: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: [ubl] IND7 UBLVersionID


Hi,

IND7 says that instance documents MUST contain the UBLVersionID element. The maindoc schemas however show UBLVersionID with minoccurs=1.

If that's a unintended discrepancy, which on is correct?

Kind regards
Juerg  

  

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath