[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Comments (Procurement)
stephen.green@systml.co.uk wrote: > 1. Every major UBL 1.0 document included DocumentStatusCode. > Any reason why of those documents (I think) only DespatchAdvice and > ReceiptAdvice have it in their UBL 2 prd2 equivalents? > From my recollection of this we felt that the use of a status could be confusing for the commercial/contractual types of document (order, invoice, etc and their variations). it was the old "is a revised Order the same as an Order Chnage" argument. It does make more sense for transport related documents (such as despatch and receipt advice) because different versions of these can be issued as the status of the delivery progresses. > 2. ReceiptAdvice is the only one of these documents not to have > Shipment or Delivery at document level in UBL 2 prd2. Why is that? > This is an issue which makes very awkward any mapping between UBL 1.0 > ReceiptAdvice and UBL 2 prd2 ReceiptAdvice. > Receipt Advice does have Shipment at the document level, it supplements the Delivery that was in UBL 1.0 (you now have ReceiptAdvice/Shipment/Delivery rather than ReceiptAdvice/Delivery). So i am not sure what you mean by this. > Thanks > > Stephen Green > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in > OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]