OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Fw: UBL 2.0 public review: link labels


Editorial comments from Stan Waren (in response to the notice on
ubl-dev).

Jon

==================================================================

Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:42:29 -0400
From: Stan Swaren <stan@swaren.com>
Subject: UBL 2.0 public review: link labels
To: jon.bosak@Sun.COM

Hi, Jon.

[I can't find the email, but I think you wanted us to send comments on 
UBL 2.0 to you directly, as well as posting to the UBL comment list, 
because of the volume of spam on that list. Here are some high-level 
observations I just posted.  Good luck with the meeting this week; wish 
I could be there!]

Nice job.  Here are some minor inconsistencies I've noticed. None of 
them is a show-stopper, but if you've got nothing better to do...


Table of Contents
-----------------

The TOC entry labeled "5 UBL 2.0 Process Context" links to section 
titled "5 Context of Use".

The TOC entry labeled "Appendix C (Informative): UBL 2.0 Data Models" 
links to a section titled "Appendix C (Informative): UBL 2.0 Document 
Models".

The TOC entry labeled "Appendix F (Informative): ASN.1" links to a 
section titled "Appendix F (Informative): ASN.1 Specification".


Normative References
--------------------

The [CCTS] entry refers to the CCTS as "ISO/TS 15000-5:2005 ... part 5" 
of the ebXML framework. However, the target document, dated 15 November 
2003, calls itself "Part 8 of the ebXML Framework". Since this could 
confuse new readers (especially as both documents are identified as 
version 2.01), I'd suggest adding an explanation.

The [XSD1] entry specifies the XSD recommendation dated 2 May 2001, but 
the first link points to the current version (dated 28 October 2004 when 
I checked). The second link points to the correct version.

The [XSD2] entry specifies the XSD recommendation dated 2 May 2001, but 
the first link points to the current version (dated 28 October 2004 when 
I checked). The second link points to the correct version.


Cheers,

- Stan

---Stan Swaren-------
---stan@swaren.com---
------613.867.9694---


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]