OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ubl] IIDs and IDIDs

If you're using them in the spreadsheets due to NDR rule, that isn't necessary because the rules only address how to go from the model to XML schema. In fact, I think it might be better if they *were* spelled out in the spreadsheet. (Doesn't really matter to me very much as long as the end result is what we expect.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, 05 September 2006 1920
To: jon.bosak@sun.com
Cc: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ubl] IIDs and IDIDs

 my understanding is that we use the abbreviation in all places, including the DEN.  we do this with other abbreviations such as CV2 and UNDG so we should do the same with UUID and URI.

that is why the spreadsheets have them that way.

jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:

> - The form that should be used for the DENs of information items
>   relating to UUIDs and URIs is a matter for CCTS experts to
>   decide.  But the form that should be used in UBL names is not
>   in question.
>Questions that are in order at this point:
> - Are the DENs used for items relating to UUIDs and URIs formed
>   correctly?
> - If not, what is their proper form?  For we shall use this form
>   when revising the spreadsheets.

tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]