RE: [ubl] Completely revised work plan for PRD3

["Sylvia Webb" <swebb@gefeg.com>]

Hi Peter,

That will work.

Regards,
Sylvia 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk] 
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:03 AM
To: swebb@gefeg.com; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [ubl] Completely revised work plan for PRD3

Hi about monday regular time.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Sylvia Webb [mailto:swebb@gefeg.com]
Sendt: 20. september 2006 19:36
Til: Peter Borresen; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: RE: [ubl] Completely revised work plan for PRD3


Hi Peter,

If we need to schedule a PSC working session to complete this work in a
timely manner, or review the changes, please let me know. 

Regards,
Sylvia
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:47 AM
To: swebb@gefeg.com; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [ubl] Completely revised work plan for PRD3

Hi Sylvia

I have not made the changes to the definitions in the spreadsheets. I was
about to, but as a non-english speaking person I did not find my self
qualified to select which phrases are the best for the definitions. I have
asked Mark to assist me.

Kind regards

Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Sylvia Webb [mailto:swebb@gefeg.com]
Sendt: 18. september 2006 20:09
Til: jon.bosak@sun.com; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: peter.borresen@datalent.dk
Emne: RE: [ubl] Completely revised work plan for PRD3


Jon,

I was expecting a new set of spreadsheets to address the minor edits you
mention below. Are my expectations correct? I haven't received anything yet.

Sylvia 

-----Original Message-----
From: jon.bosak@sun.com [mailto:jon.bosak@sun.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 6:10 AM
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: peter.borresen@datalent.dk
Subject: [ubl] Completely revised work plan for PRD3

Given the fact that we can't get all the nonsubstantive changes in by the
time UBL 2.0 CD balloting ends Wednesday, I'm going to suggest that we do
just the opposite: go to public review with
PRD3 just the way it is (with only the addition of the ASN.1 schemas, which
I'm still expecting before Wednesday, and a revised qDT module), and log all
the changes I enumerated previously as nonsubstantive issues to be resolved
after the public review.
This way we can incorporate all the nonsubstantive revisions in a single
pass.

More specifically....

Week of 18 September:

 - GEFEG provides revised qDT module by time of Pacific TC call
   00:30 - 02:30 UTC Tuesday 19 September 2006 (this is Monday
   evening in New York), or earlier if possible

 - Thorpe provides ASN.1 schemas by time of Pacific TC call

 - Lemming provides PRD3 change log by time of Pacific TC call

 - Bosak rebuilds package Tuesday

 - Bosak puts out call for "successful use" statements

 - PRD3 is submitted to OASIS Thursday morning

 - Holman converts index file to DocBook (that's actually supposed
   to happen this weekend, but it won't become relevant till after
   PRD3 goes in to OASIS)

Week of 25 September (first week of public review):

 - McGrath revises artwork

 - Bosak and McGrath propose wording changes for review by PSC and
   TSC based on input summarized below

 - PSC and TSC (1) review previous copy edits and (2)
   accept/reject further proposed edits

 - UBL TC members prepare statements of "successful use" in
   preparation for OASIS Standardization

Week of 2 October (second week of public review):

 - TC reviews revised spreadsheets

 - 2.0 editors debug new docbook-based production and collate
   materials required for Standardization submission

Week of 9 October:

 - Review public comments and make further nonsubstantive changes

 - Revise the package

 - Ballot the package as a Committee Specification

If anyone has a problem with this plan, please let us know ASAP.
Otherwise I'll expect to have the change log, the revised qDT module, and
the ASN.1 schemas by the time of the Pacific call.

I've reproduced the nonsubstantive issues list below for reference.

Jon

==================================================================

##################################################################
Schema generation corrections
##################################################################

1. Revise qDT module to change each qDT from

      <xsd:extension base="xsd:normalizedString">

   to

      <xsd:restriction base="udt:CodeType">

   (Note that this does not affect UBL instances.)

2. Change copyright from 

      Copyright (C) OASIS Open 2001-2005. All Rights Reserved.

   to

      Copyright (C) OASIS Open 2001-2006. All Rights Reserved.

##################################################################
Spreadsheet corrections
##################################################################

1. The copy edits made last month have not been reviewed yet.
   Someone with business knowledge needs to take responsibility
   for this. (J. Bosak) See:

   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200608/msg00077.html
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200608/msg00078.html

2. The note on column A in the spreadsheets says that columns with
   grey headings are not part of the normative schemas; but
   columns A and B have grey headings, and they are normative.
   (J. Bosak)

3. Regularize the definitions of UUID per

   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200609/msg00006.html
   (G. K. Holman)

4. "The RemittanceLine definitions all say Statement instead of
   Remittance." (S. Green)

5. "TransportEvent has the general Event definition." (S. Green)

6. "The definition for LineResponse may be incorrect."  (S. Green)

7. "The definitions for all but one element in the ReminderLine
   are those for StatementLine and refer to Statement in error."
   (S. Green)

8. "Should there be a difference between TransactionConditions and
   TradingTerms?" (S. Green)

9. "Minor grammar error in definition of Party/PhysicalLocation
   '... may visited...' should read '...may be visited...' and
   'visited' is not a desirable term here." (S. Green)

##################################################################
Artwork corrections
##################################################################

1. "The Transportation Status document type is not described in
   the Initiate Service Process diagram (Figure 19)." (Y. Saito)

2. "The informative UML diagrams are missing the new Item,
   Quantity, and Price in CreditNoteLine and DebitNoteLine."
   (P. Borresen)