[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Draft IDD 2.0 templates
Hi Oriol, the due date depends of single LSCs efforts, we all have to estimate the localization process, after this I think we'll be able to choose a due date. Some estimates are 4 weeks other 6 months... also these are just estimates, I personally need to ask ITLSC members to give their availability. At the moment ITLSC localization time has been moved from 4 weeks to 3 months after some member feedback. Next UBL TC conference will choose the best solution for templates. As Yukinori Saito stated, I think we need to add a title (and date) as template header, as this is useful when templates are printed during the translation process. At this point as the template has to be printed I think both "No." column and a suitable header are necessary. Thank you for your feedback ! UBL ITLSC co-chair Roberto Cisternino > Hi all, > > Roberto, we want to thank you very much the effort in the localization > templates design, this will be very helpful. > > We think that probably the best approach should be the third one, so > adding > the column as the rightmost so each LC can use it but it won't affect the > IDD generation process. > > We are already working on the translation and we would like to know if > there > is a due date in order to plan our time. > > Best regards, > > Oriol Bausą > Co-chair ESLSC > > > -----Original Message----- > From: roberto@javest.com [mailto:roberto@javest.com] > Sent: jueves, 23 de noviembre de 2006 15:58 > To: jon.bosak@sun.com > Cc: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org; n.itoh@otsuka-shokai.co.jp; > naitoh@is.oit.ac.jp; kueno@iea.att.ne.jp; kunio_ohno@justsystem.co.jp > Subject: Re: [ubl] Draft IDD 2.0 templates > > Hello everybody, > > as localization templates have been designed to allow an automatic merge > necessary to achieve the final complete IDD, we have to consider 3 choices > for the Business Process column: > > 1) I add the column to all templates for all languages. > > 2) JPLSC adds the column for internal use and I remove it just before the > merge process (not a clean way). > > 3) JPLSC or others could add the column at the rightmost (latest) column, > this way the merce process could ignore the column, or this column could > be just "hidden" before the merge process. > > NOTE: Another important issue I found by checking the JPLSC sample is they > modified the template header (by ading a title and a date). If this is > necessary we have to do it for all templates and LSCs. > > For general info the UBL module title is already available as a file-name > (thus is visible on the title bar of Excel) and also into spreadsheet > properties (under File menu). > > I am not sure I will be able to attend the conference call yet, I will try > to organize myself, however I will reply any question where necessary > ASAP. > > Best Regards > > UBL ITLSC > co-chair > Roberto Cisternino > > >> [saito-yukinori@fujielectric.co.jp:] >> >> | I made the Common library spreadsheet that contains Business Process >> column. >> | I attached the Common library spreadsheet for JPLSC use. >> | I would like to use this spreadsheet for our Japanese translation. >> >> We need to discuss this during the conference calls next week. >> >> Among the questions I have: >> >> - If this is useful for JPLSC, then why not for all of us? >> >> - If this is useful only for JPLSC, what are the implications for >> making an integrated IDD? >> >> - Judging from the example, the only two "business processes" are >> "Procurement" and "Transportation." >> >> - Is this a useful distinction? >> >> - What do we do with information items that are used both for >> procurement and for transportation? >> >> - The business process assignments in the spec are much finer >> grained (Create Catalogue, Ordering, Fulfilment with Receipt >> Advice, etc.). Why are we not using those? >> >> Note that I am not saying that I think the Business Process column >> is not useful. I just want to be clear on how best to implement this >> idea. >> >> Jon >> > > > Roberto Cisternino > > Roberto Cisternino
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]