[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 24 October 2007
Jon, we have no disagreement as to the meaning of the word submission; in this context, it obviously means "to make available for use", as in your quote below from the b: definition in Webster. However, the fact that a word has certain inescapable connotations and/or consequences cannot be denied just because a dictionary entry does not, properly, include them in the definition. Looking at Webster's definition of "accident", for instance [1], does not bring up the word insurance, nor does it bring up the possibility of loss of limb or life as a consequence of an accident. This does not mean however (at least to me, and I bet to you too) that it would be prudent to drive a car with no insurance in a careless manner just because the dictionary does not mention some of the possible consequences of a car accident. Similarly, just because the definition of the word "submission" does not include a reference to possible IP transfer of ownership does not mean such transfer is not a possible consequence of such submission. If you look at how a PAS Submission at ISO or a Member Submission at W3C are formally structured, you will see that they definitely have IP connotations as to the subsequent IP ownership of the submission once it's accepted (which, by the way, suggests to me that the difference between a submission and a contribution is that a contribution is what a submission becomes once it is accepted; but one could also argue that there is not a whole lot of a difference, since at least one definition of "contribute" is "to *submit* articles for publication" [2]). So I think it's quite incorrect to say that "OASIS is alone in attaching the concept of IP ownership to the word submission". It's simply not so. What a TC produces is IP; to make it available for use by others inherently transfers that IP to the others unless it's done in the proper manner; and the proper manner in OASIS is either for OASIS Staff to formally submit it to a third party (as in the case of an ISO PAS submission) with all the i's dotted and the t's crossed as regards the submission's IP, or for the TC to publish it in the OASIS site with the prescribed copyright notice, from where a third party can pluck it at will but under the obligations spelled out by the OASIS copyright notice. What is not acceptable is for a TC vice-chair to submit OASIS material to a third party for their indiscriminate use. The last time this happened the third party simply used it with no acknowledgment of the TC's or OASIS's part in its creation, and with no carrying forward of OASIS's copyright. And that is just wrong. [1] I'm traveling, so I have no access to a printed copy of a dictionary; thus I'm constrained to quote from Webster's online definition: 1 a: an unforeseen and unplanned event or circumstance b: lack of intention or necessity : chance <met by accident rather than by design> 2 a: an unfortunate event resulting especially from carelessness or ignorance b: an unexpected and medically important bodily event especially when injurious <a cerebrovascular accident> c: an unexpected happening causing loss or injury which is not due to any fault or misconduct on the part of the person injured but for which legal relief may be sought d: used euphemistically to refer to an involuntary act or instance of urination or defecation 3: a nonessential property or quality of an entity or circumstance <the accident of nationality> [2] Webster's online, again. On 10/26/07 07:55, Jon.Bosak@Sun.COM wrote: >> Why is there talk about submissions? > > Because that's what they're called. A submission is something > submitted; in this context, to submit is "a: to send or commit for > consideration, study, or decision: REFER" (example: "submit a > question to the court"), or "b: to present or make available for > use or study" (example: "submit a report") -- Webster's Third New > International Dictionary, Unabridged. > > I am aware that some in OASIS consider "submission" a synonym for > "contribution." That's now how it's being used in the groups that > the UBL TC deals with, and the association with a transfer of > intellectual property is not supported by any of the dictionaries > of English that I own, which, as you know, is quite a few. > > As far as I can tell, OASIS is alone in attaching the concept of > intellectual property ownership to the word "submission." As we > have no other mutually understood English word to describe what > we're doing in "presenting or making available" the results of our > work "for use or study" by TBG17, my advice to OASIS is to get > over it. > > Jon > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > -- Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM Technology Director | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 (internal x31442) Corporate Standards | Sun Microsystems Inc. W3C AC Rep / W3C AB / OASIS BoD 456
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]