[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Newly detected backward compatibility error - TransportContract
Ok Ken, forget sub-contracts now, also it is not viable as this addition would require a party too. I vote for (A) as nomination and delivery date are common concepts to transportation, constructions, ... I really prefere we enhance the actual base Contract for these new info. Roberto > At 2010-07-22 16:27 +0200, Roberto Cisternino wrote: >>I have a business question on this topic. >> >>For which reason we are going to use a specific "Transport Contract" >> class >>over the generic "Contract" class ? > > Yes, the answer to that is critical to the direction we choose to take. > >> From the information below I do not see a valid reason. I mean the >>following information seems to me still related to *any* contract and >>sub-contract. >> >>So I would see a more simple solution where we just update the actual >>cac:Contract by adding "NominationPeriod" and "ContractualDelivery" at >> the >>end of its structure. > > Yes, this is my proposed solution (A) to this problem. All the more > reason if they are not specific to transportation as I was worried they > were. > > A note to the TSC: the existing Contract has only optional > constructs so it would seem that (A) would meet your users needs by > leaving the "old" constructs absent and only using the new constructs > you have defined. > >>Moreover I would suggest to add a Sub-Contract (0..n) too. > > Can we please leave that question to the response to PRD01? I know > it is a simple change but at this (very!) late stage to prepare PRD01 > for review I would like to restrict discussions only to things that > at this moment are broken or unresolved. > > . . . . . . . . . . . Ken > >> > At 2010-07-18 22:02 -0400, I wrote: >> >><cac:TransportContract> is obliged to contain at >> >>least the old children, but it is allowed to >> >>have new optional children. I see three ways to fix this: >> >> >> >>(A) We could add the new items to the old >> >><Contract> but they aren't related to contracts >> >>in general, only to transportation >> >>contracts. But that isn't so bad since users >> >>are already used to finding things in objects that they don't need. > > > > -- > XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01 > Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/i/ > Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/ > G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com > Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/bc > Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > -- * JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino * * Document Engineering Services Ltd. - Alliance Member * UBL Italian Localization SubCommittee (ITLSC), co-Chair * UBL Online Community editorial board member (ubl.xml.org) * Italian UBL Advisor Roberto Cisternino mobile: +39 328 2148123 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +39 328 2148123 end_of_the_skype_highlighting skype: roberto.cisternino.ubl-itlsc [UBL Technical Committee] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl [UBL Online Community] http://ubl.xml.org [UBL International Conferences] http://www.ublconference.org [UBL Italian Localization Subcommittee] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl-itlsc [Iniziativa divulgativa UBL Italia] http://www.ubl-italia.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]