RE: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 14 December 2011

[Audun Vennesland <Audun.Vennesland@sintef.no>]

Hi Tim,

I think the new definitions are a major improvement. Are there any particular "guidelines" you are following? I have a deliverable soon coming up in one of the European projects using UBL and could assist on definitions for the transport related elements if you want.

Best regards,
Audun

-----Original Message-----
From: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:ubl@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tim McGrath
Sent: 9. januar 2012 11:38
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 14 December 2011

as part of my task to review the definitions i have made a sample (see
attached) comparing previous(PRD2) and new candidate definitions.

before i go too far i would welcome feedback as to the quality of these.  Please compare columns Q and R in the attached sheet.


On 17/12/11 9:14 AM, Jon Bosak wrote:
> MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING WEDNESDAY 14 DECEMBER 2011
>
> BIE DEFINITIONS
>
>    From previous meetins: It appears that we will need to review all of
>    the definitions and revise or redo about half of them before we can
>    release PRD3.
>
>       AGREED that this is better handled if one person does the
>       revisions and then the subcommittees review them.
>
>       ACTION: TM to prepare an initial edit of the definitions, aiming
>       for delivery at the end of January with review in conference
>       calls.
>
>