[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Data type qualification code lists for UBL 2.1
Just to close the loop on this. We discussed it on the PSC call yesterday.The TaxScheme.ID and TaxScheme.Name are possibly poorly named, but there are no specific code lists for these. tred5305 and 5153 do not cover the requirements (we think 5305 is actually UK HMRC VAT codes). Most tax regimes issue these independently and change them quite frequently - they are localised. Some are not true codes either - just names.
In short, we found it simpler to refer to them as IDs not Codes - and this is now well established in the user community. So i propose we leave it as-is.
Also, i dont think there is a barrier to implementers using the code list validation against an ID element if they wish to.
On 7/05/12 3:44 AM, G. Ken Holman wrote:
I agree with you, Kees, they appear to be using the code lists in the identifier fields.Which isn't "wrong" ... I was just expecting something else in my naïveté. I should stick to the angle brackets.So I can add those two tax code lists to the special purpose directory: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/prd2-UBL-2.1/cl/gc/special-purpose/ ... as a convenience for users. I'll get the values from: http://www.unece.org/trade/untdid/d11a/tred/tred5305.htm http://www.unece.org/trade/untdid/d11a/tred/tred5153.htm ... or their XSD equivalents if I can find them.Actually, I found them quite quickly, but they appear to be based on D10B and not D11A, yet were only published two months ago:http://www.unece.org/uncefact/codelist/standard/UNECE_DutyTaxFeeTypeCode_D10B.xsdhttp://www.unece.org/uncefact/codelist/standard/UNECE_DutyorTaxorFeeCategoryCode_D10B.xsdI'm unsure why the HTML rendition would be D11A and the schema rendition only D10B. Tim said that a new set of files would be published in 6 to 8 weeks, so perhaps we'll see the D11A versions as XSD files then.Thank you for this guidance, Kees! . . . . . . . . . . Ken At 2012-05-06 08:30 +0000, you wrote:At 2012-05-05 16:16 +0000, Duvekot, Kees wrote: >>When looking at the CEN/BII Tax guidlines the say the following:>>paragraph 2.3: Tax category ID should be based on UN/ECE code list 5305.>The ID or the type? I would have thought type, not ID. Do you have>a citation for this guideline for the benefit of readers of the archive?http://spec.cenbii.eu/Profiles/Guidelines/BII%20Guideline%2009%20-%20Tax%20v1.pdf2.3 Tax Category Tax Category describes a subdivision of a Tax Scheme.It may be the case that a tax has different rates for the same TaxCategory.ID. Since rates for categories differ between countries it is recommended that the tax percentage is also given.- TaxScheme.ID = ‘VAT’ - TaxScheme.Name = ‘Value added tax’ - TaxCategory.ID = ‘S’ - TaxCategory.Percent = ‘5’ or ‘12’Each rate for the Tax Scheme / Category combination must be calculated in a separate Tax Subtotal.Tax category ID should be based on UN/ECE code list 5305.Based on this description you can clearly see that they really use the ID element (because there is no other element that can be used)-- Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Europe -- Oct 2012 Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
begin:vcard fn:Tim McGrath n:McGrath;Tim org:Document Engineering Services email;internet:email@example.com title:Managing Director tel;work:+61893352228 tel;home:+61438352228 tel;cell:+61438352228 url:www.documentengineeringservices.com version:2.1 end:vcard