RE: [ubl] Re: Draft new Additional Document Constraints

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2013-01-08 10:02 +1300, JPT wrote:
> To illustrate: For "Note. Prose_ Text. Type":
> A "cbc:" named NoteProse would be created, but no new udt: or qdt: required
> Property Term Qualifier = "Prose"
> Property Term Possessive Noun = ""
> Property Term Primary Term = "Note"
> Data Type Qualifier = "Prose"
> Data Type = "Prose_ Note .Type"
> Correct?

Ouch!  Yes, you are correct.  And we cannot change the element names 
because of backward compatibility.

Drat ... I knew it would take more thinking, but I didn't realize 
that it might be a non-starter because of the impact of the qualifier 
on the name.

Anyway ... I still don't have the time to think about this because of 
the many 2.1 issues on my plate right now.

Let's look at this for 2.2.  But I'll use the new wording for UBL 2.1 
unless someone thinks we shouldn't because it isn't programmatically 
checkable as a conformance criterion.

Thanks, again, Juerg.

. . . . . . . Ken


--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal