[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Your 15 day Public Review of UBL v2.1 CSPRD03 has been announced
I am responding to the Public Review of UBL v2.1 CSPRD03, launched on 15 March 2013.
As you may know, I am supporting the European Commission digitising pre-award processes using UBL. In this context, we have been reviewing all XSDs connect with pre-award e-Procurement. We have therefore piloted the use of UBL documents for submitting tenders in electronic format. Our tests showed that the most important features are provided but there are still a few issues to be resolved. I would therefore like to report the following 4 issues on behalf of the European Commission:
1. In
the UBL-Tender-2.1.xsd, there is no way to link a DocumentReference to
a specific Lot.
The lots can be specified by using the following element:
Tender/cac:TenderedProject/cac:ProcurementProjectLot
However, in the document reference:
Tender/cac:DocumentReference
there is no (child or other) element
that can be used to link the document to a specific Lot.
2. In
the UBL-Tender-2.1.xsd, there is no way to specify the envelope type associated
to a document.
In the document reference:
Tender/cac:DocumentReference
there is no (child or other) element
to specify the envelope type, i.e. if the document belongs to the financial
or to the technical envelope of the tender (very common in EU tenders).
3. In
the UBL-Tender-2.1.xsd, there is no way to specify the envelope type associated
to a document.
In the context of restricted procedures, it would be helpful to have
an element to specify the related qualification xml document. In this type
of procedure the qualification document is sent before the tender, in the
tender.xml we should be able to specify the link with the previously sent
qualification.
4. In
the UBL-TendererQualification-2.1, the cardinality of Completed tasks for
evidences should be 0..n instead of 0..1
The cardinality of the field:
../cac:CompletedTasks/cac:EvidenceSupplied
should be 0..n, as several evidences
might be needed for the completed tasks.
The other similar fields in the same xsd:
../cac:TechnicalCapability/cac:EvidenceSupplied
../cac:FinancialCapability/cac:EvidenceSupplied
already have a 0..n cardinality.
I would appreciate it if you could acknowledge receipt of these comments as described in OASIS’ requirements for handling comments.
Thank you very much in advance.
With kind regards,
João
Joao Frade
PwC | Senior Manager
Direct: +32 2 7109284 | Mobile: +32 477 842292 | Fax: +32 2 7107224
Email: joao.frade@pwc.be
PwC Enterprise Advisory cvba/scrl
Firm legal information, click here
From:
Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
To:
ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:
15/03/2013 23:11
Subject:
[ubl] Your 15
day Public Review of UBL v2.1 CSPRD03 has been announced
Sent by:
<ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]