[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 23 April 2014 14:00UTC - voting meeting
ATTENDANCE
Atlantic teleconference:
Oriol Bausa
Peter Borresen
Kees Duvekot
G. Ken Holman (convener)
Ole Madsen
Pacific teleconference attendance:
G. Ken Holman (convener)
Tim McGrath
Andy Schoka
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to events calendar: https://ubl.xml.org/events
- no events to add at this time
Review of Pacific call minutes
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201404/msg00024.html
Review of Atlantic call minutes
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201404/msg00019.html
Membership status review
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#membership
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/roster.php?num_items=80
- voting status is determined by the following:
- existing voting members must not miss two consecutive meetings to
maintain voting status
- non-voting members must attend two consecutive meetings to obtain
voting status
- current voting member list (alphabetical):
- Oriol Bausa
- Kenneth Bengtsson
- Jon Bosak (secretary)
- Kees Duvekot
- G. Ken Holman (co-chair)
- Ole Madsen
- Tim McGrath (co-chair)
- Andy Schoka (TSC chair)
- members gaining voting status after this meeting:
- Peter Borresen
- members approaching losing voting status:
- Kenneth Bengtsson
- what can we do to recruit more volunteers to the TC to share
in the work?
JIRA tickets
https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10170
- no action needed
Web site maintenance
- no action needed
International Data Dictionary
- Ken has written OASIS TC Administration regarding the use of a Google
spreadsheet
- the spreadsheet would be publicly visible but only modified by members
- the TC would invite input to the spreadsheet through the UBL Comment
List in order to address any IPR issues regarding the contributions
from the public
- TC Administration has accepted the above modus operandi with the proviso
that periodic snapshots of the work be posted to Kavi
- Ken will now write the XSLT stylesheets to merge the UBL 2.0 IDD with the
UBL 2.1 definitions and create the raw UBL 2.1 IDD spreadsheets and try
to mount them on Google (the Google Drive documentation indicates this
shouldn't be a problem based on recent updates to Google software, but
Ken has been experiencing problems with other large spreadsheets)
Conformance to CCTS 2.01
- Do members of the TC agree that the Committee Note Draft 01 of UBL
Conformance to ebXML CCTS ISO/TS 15000-5:2005 Version 1.0 dated 23
April 2014 does not need a public review?
- AGREED - unanimous by those present (only one voting member absent)
- Do members of the TC approve requesting that OASIS TC Administration
hold a Special Majority Ballot to approve Committee Note Draft 01
of UBL Conformance to ebXML CCTS ISO/TS 15000-5:2005 Version 1.0
dated 23 April 2014 contained in:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=52790
... to be published as Committee Note 01 of UBL Conformance to ebXML
CCTS ISO/TS 15000-5:2005 Version 1.0 dated 23 April 2014 contained
in:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=52791
... as approved with TC Administration?
- AGREED - unanimous by those present (only one voting member absent)
Naming and Design Rules
- Ken has submitted the formal request to register the new NDR document
as a work product in the Standards Track
- https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-1704
- Ken has started editing and will post a draft soon for committee comment
- Ken outlined that the new NDR has prescriptive rules for someone needing
to write new models (e.g. extensions to UBL or custom documents) and
it has descriptive non-normative clauses relating the UBL TC application
of the rules to produce UBL 2.1
- Kees suggests we consider splitting the two into separate documents, the
OASIS Standard being the prescriptive rules and a Committee Note being the
descriptive clauses of how the UBL TC followed the rules
UBL TC next steps
- what promotional issues need to be addressed?
- UBL 2 is an organic thing that can be grown
- what do we do for implementation support?
- should we write a companion document of how to use the specification?
- industry-specific documentation?
- make it easier to find what is relevant without changing the actual
specification
- how about another UBL International conference in order to
promote the release of UBL 2.1? Can anyone host this conference?
http://ublconference.com or http://ublconference.org
- perhaps an event in North America and in Europe in 2014
- Washington DC, Burlington MA (OASIS)?
- http://www.exchange-summit.com/ - Barcelona - October 2014
- BII - Paris in June? Frankfurt in September?
- Beijing June 2014 (JTC 1 SC32)?
- how about a Twitter feed of UBL adoption and announcements?
- what subject matter issues need to be addressed?
- more transportation co-ordination issues
- communications with transportation regulatory organizations
- what technical issues need to be addressed?
- are any schema changes needed?
- what educational materials need to be made available?
- how about YouTube videos regarding access to the UBL package?
TC CONCALL SCHEDULE
Next meetings:
2014-04-30 Pacific 00:00UTC/20:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
2014-05-07 No meetings this week
2014-05-14 Pacific 00:00UTC/20:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
At the 2014-04-30 meeting please bring forward your ideas for the summer
schedule.
Please consider having a light meeting schedule in June, perhaps only a
single meeting mid-month.
Will anyone be requesting a leave of absence in the near future? For
privacy reasons, this discussion will be kept off of the minutes.
TC calendar:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/calendar.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
TC calendar iCal subscription link:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup_feeds/ical/my_vcalendar.ics?token=fa658a7994a6cefb10c10be09e139af3&workgroup_id=50
OTHER BUSINESS
- question regarding inferred order of information in a UBL document
- Kees asks about the example of the Address Line being a repeatable
CAC: the order of the lines is inferred by the order of the
elements, is this sufficient? can it be assumed that a recipient's
system will interpret the address lines correctly
- will put on the agenda for next week, but if anyone has any ideas
or input, please use the TC mail list before then
--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/about |
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]