Re: SV: [ubl] Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 6 August 2014 14:00UTC

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2014-08-06 10:05 +0200, JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino wrote:
> I see Peter,
> but I could not have that level of detail.
>
> The requirement is simply to support the case where an invoice is 
> related to one or more purchase orders.

I understand you see this as a simple requirement, Roberto, but may I 
ask you, please, to elaborate how such a change would be exploited by users?

During today's teleconference the point was raised that the header 
reference is used as a kind of default for the line items that do not 
have a specific reference.  If more than one order is allowed to be 
referenced at the header level, the absence of a line reference would 
be ambiguous and prevent processing software to reliably match 
invoice items to order items.

I've recognized your requirement in the committee's JIRA project:

  https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-8

Meanwhile, could you either comment there (your committee membership 
should be enough credentials) or here on the list?

Thanks for this input!

. . . . . . Ken


--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/video.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile:      http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/about |
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com