OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ubl] Groups - UBL Post-Award Subcommittee Charter uploaded


referring to "Post-Award Procurement components" in the common library could still  signal that there is a Post-Award specific "subset" within the common library model.
I think that is not the case, and that the common library model spans the whole scope of UBL and the elements can be used by any document when relevant.

Therefor I think the SC should make a proposal to the TC for changes to the common library model ... so that the impact of that change, or the interaction between documents of other SCs can be analysed and discussed.
That will lead to better understanding across all SC's and elimination of redundant/duplicate elements in the whole library.

And I assume that the same is also mentioned in the Pre-Award SC charter?

Van: Tim McGrath [tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 28 april 2015 1:56
Aan: Duvekot, Kees
CC: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Onderwerp: Re: [ubl] Groups - UBL Post-Award Subcommittee Charter uploaded

Good point.

How about…

2. The Post-Award Procurement components of the UBL common library model.

As it is a list of deliverables we can assume it is development and maintenance.

On 27 Apr 2015, at 15:30, Duvekot, Kees <kduvekot@Wehkamp.nl<mailto:kduvekot@Wehkamp.nl>> wrote:


I have looked at this charter and I have one question.
In the “List of Deliverables” under point 2 it says:

“2. The UBL Post-Award Procurement common library model.”

This could be interpreted that there is a separate common library model for the Post-Award part of UBL. This is not the case .. there is one single common library that the whole of UBL is using.
Should this be re-written to show that the SC is responsible for updating the common library model for the parts it is using?, or propose changes to the common library to the UBL TC? (the last option might be best .. because changes could effect other documents maintained by other SC’s also)


Van: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:ubl@lists.oasis-open.org> [mailto:ubl@lists.oasis-open.org] Namens Tim McGrath
Verzonden: maandag 27 april 2015 2:57
Aan: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Onderwerp: [ubl] Groups - UBL Post-Award Subcommittee Charter uploaded

Submitter's message
Please review this draft before the meetings of week commencing April 27th 2015.
-- Mr. Tim McGrath
Document Name: UBL Post-Award Subcommittee Charter<https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/document.php?document_id=55535>
Charter for the UBL subcommittee dealing with Post-Award Procurement
Download Latest Revision<https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/download.php/55535/latest/UBL%20Post-Award%20Subcommittee%20Draft%20Charter.docx>
Public Download Link<https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=55535&wg_abbrev=ubl>
Submitter: Mr. Tim McGrath
Group: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
Folder: Discussion drafts
Date submitted: 2015-04-26 17:56:31

Tim McGrath
Fremantle, Western Australia 6160
Phone: +61438352228
Skype: t.mcgrath

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]