[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 20 July 2016 01:00UTC - voting meeting
Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 20 July 2016 01:00UTC - voting meeting
ATTENDANCE
Kenneth Bengtsson
G. Ken Holman (convener)
Tim McGrath
Andy Schoka
REFERENCING THE SPECIFICATION
- the following should be used as a specific citation:
OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) v2.1 (ISO/IEC 19845:2015)
- the following would be used for a general (any version) citation:
OASIS UBL (ISO/IEC 19845)
- the canonical documents are available in the OASIS repository:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/os-UBL-2.1/
- the ISO/IEC catalogue entry is found at:
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=66370
- the ISO/IEC document and attachments are found at:
http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to events calendar: http://ubl.xml.org/events
- 28th Forum for UN/CEFACT
Bangkok, Thailand - 26 to 30 September 2016
http://www.unece.org/28thuncefactforum
- TC204 meeting
Auckland, New Zealand - 2 to 7 October 2016
http://www.itsnz.org/events.html
Review of Atlantic call minutes
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201607/msg00004.html
Review of Pacific call minutes
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201607/msg00001.html
Membership status review
<https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#membership>https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#membership
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
<https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/roster.php?num_items=80>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/roster.php?num_items=80
- voting status is determined by the following:
- existing voting members must not miss two consecutive meetings to
maintain voting status
- non-voting members must attend two consecutive meetings to obtain
voting status
- members formally on leave by prior request must not attend and
their voting status is not impacted
- committee officers (alphabetical):
- Jon Bosak (secretary)
- G. Ken Holman (co-chair)
- Tim McGrath (co-chair)
- current UBL TC voting member list (alphabetical) and relationships:
- Oriol Bausa
- Member OASIS BDXR, Member OASIS ebXML, Editor TC434 Validation
- Kenneth Bengtsson
- Chair OASIS BDXR, Member OASIS ebXML
- Kees Duvekot
- Member OASIS BDXR
- G. Ken Holman
- Member OASIS BDXR, CA Member JTC 1/SC32, CA Expert UN/CEFACT
- Ole Madsen
- DK Member CEN/TC440, CEN/TC440 Liaison JTC 1/SC 32
- Tim McGrath
- EESPA Observer CEN/TC434, AU Expert UN/CEFACT
- Andy Schoka
- Member ISO/TC204, US Member JTC 1/SC 32
- active non-voting member
- Roberto Cisternino
- members approaching losing voting status:
- Kees Duvekot
UBL 2.2
- the initial suggestion period for UBL 2.2 is now closed
- the TC is now expecting each of the Transportation, Pre-award and
Post-award subcommittees to make the recommendations for 2.2 additions
to be agreed upon by the TC; this is done by way of a JIRA ticket
- Andy managing requirements for transportation documents
- Kees managing requirements for post-award documents
- Ole managing requirements for pre-award documents
- Roberto managing requirements for party information document
- more than a business card and less than a company dossier
- the initial master UBL 2.2 spreadsheet is found here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qXmbTu4aNak7s7yxHeKxj5mmfiIBj_CQqq7rJT3Vizg/view
- the latest working draft release of UBL 2.2 using only the 2.1 model:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201606/msg00031.html
- documentation requirements
- a Google text document of the hub document is here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yv2y6EQkHhGjjgIpwBNpWdxi5tDY3l0-NwkwDM0MpYg/edit
- committee members have been given permissions to edit the document
- Ken will try to move the content into XML when the edits are complete
- removing hanging paragraphs by adding introductory sections
- disambiguating section titles
- each submitter of new documents and objects must consider what additional
documentation is needed in the UBL hub document:
- general business rules - sections 2.1.x
- business objects - sections 2.x
- party roles - section 2.19
- example instances - sections 3.1.x
- do we need to create RELAX-NG schemas for UBL 2.2?
- Ken can poll the UBL-Dev mail list to ask the community there
- Tim observed that what we could do is just point people to the tool
that creates RELAX-NG from W3C Schema:
https://github.com/relaxng/jing-trang
- do we need to create ASN.1 and UML deliverables for UBL 2.2?
- ASN.1 still important for user communities such as TC204
- UML is still important, but it is not an automated process nor trivial
- Ken has questions regarding property term possessive noun and property
term primary noun used in the tendering business objects, as an example,
those found in the ABIE TenderedProject
- will fix these as encountered
- note that the property term is comprised of the possessive noun and
the primary noun in such a manner that the primary noun should be the
noun of what the object is, and the possessive noun should be such that
the natural language is as adding the possessive "apostrophe s"
- example: "Tender Amount"
- the primary noun is "Amount" and the possessive noun is "Tender"
as if one would say "the tender's amount"
- note also that the property term should not rely on the reader knowing
representation term to understand what is the business object
- example: "Tender Amount"
- it would be inappropriate for the primary noun to be "tender" even
when the element name becomes "TenderAmount" because one would need
to know the representation term is "Amount"
- when the element name is derived and the primary noun is equal to
the representation term, the duplication doesn't show up in the name
- please review all JIRA tickets and comment and/or act where necessary:
https://issues.oasis-open.org/issues/?filter=12972
- all of the issues are to be closed by September 1, 2016 in order to
create the first committee specification draft and public review draft
- please remember to document your actions on the ticket and then assign
the ticket to the next person (usually Ken) to deal with the ticket, as
others won't know what is being done
UBL-28 Open Unresolved - Support for Verified Gross Mass
- Ole has posted on this
UBL-27 Open Unresolved - Code lists for UBL 2.2
UBL-26 Open Unresolved - Handle Encryption
- Ole will update Pre-award spreadsheet with a new BBIE for the coded item
UBL-25 Open Unresolved - Pre-award SC put the changes forward to the TC
- changes for 2.2. discussed with Oriol, Tim will focus on generalizing
the EU terminology and aligning, where possible, with existing structures
- cleaning up naming components
UBL-24 Applied - Comment submission re: document version history
- propose we close this now: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-24
- AGREED (pending Atlantic call) - unanimous by those present
UBL-23 Applied - Comment submission re: freight credit note
- propose we close this now: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-23
- AGREED (pending Atlantic call) - unanimous by those present
UBL-22 Applied - Comment submission from Norway re: tender receipt
- propose we close this now: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-22
- AGREED (pending Atlantic call) - unanimous by those present
UBL-21 Open Unresolved - Pre-award documents will need to engage the
language code list in the second-pass validation
- Oriol will update Pre-award spreadsheet with "Language" as qualified data type for the BBIEs affected - the ISO code list for languages is suitable to be engaged for the default second-pass validation UBL-19 Open Unresolved - Minor changes based on applying new NDR to UBL 2.1 - changes made in the lab documents and will be available in next draftUBL-18 Open Unresolved - Align CreditNote with Invoice document around withholding tax information
UBL-16 Open Unresolved - Allow for requested document distribution in Waybill and Bill of Lading document types
UBL-7 Open Unresolved - Adding OrderChangeDocumentReference to OrderResponse/OrderResponseSimple documents
UBL-2 Open Unresolved - Documents for party information exchange UBL-1 Open Unresolved - Documents for integrating supply chain Naming and Design Rules - Business Document Naming and Design Rules Version 1.0 Committee Specification Draft 02 vote held and passed, CS01 being prepared:<https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TCADMIN-2405>https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TCADMIN-2405
- UBL Naming and Design Rules Version 3.0 Committee Note 01 is now ready
to be accepted in order to be published:
- non-material changes to the last public review:
- proper date for the reference to BD-NDR Committee Specification
- proper release information
- aligned annexes to BD-NDR annexes (former Annex C had been removed)
- vote: Does the committee agree to accept as final the following
as UBL Naming and Design Rules Version 3.0 Committee Note 01 and
request TC Administration to publish it with any metadata or other
non-material changes as requested from TC Admin?
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=58522
- AGREED (pending Atlantic call) - unanimous by those present
JSON Task Group
- notes from last week:
- it was suggested that we create a JSON task group to explore the
appropriateness of the technology w.r.t. UBL
- JSON and noSQL database solutions are good for working *with*
UBL documents
- XML is good for representing UBL documents for interchange
- many vendors are coming out with solutions incorporating JSON, but they
are all bespoke and incompatible with each other
- if we ended up with a methodology for applying UBL structures in a
JSON environment, this may be helpful to the community
- no action this week; still looking for a lead to take on this review
UBL 2.1 spreadsheet/information errata found (non-material)
- Tim reported that the additions to UBL 2.2 Pre-award were difficult to
determine because the version value for the new items were not properly set
- for the record, new NDR consistency checks have revealed that the "current
version" column of the UBL 2.1 model has incorrect values for 27 entries,
rather than the proper value of "2.1":
Consignment. Shipping Priority Level Code. Code: "2.0"
Declaration. Evidence Supplied: "1.0"
Document Reference. Result Of Verification: "2.0"
External Reference. Hash Algorithm Method. Text: "1.0"
Pickup. Pickup_ Party. Party: "2.0"
Shipment. Return_ Address. Address: "2.0"
Status. Condition: "2.0"
Transport Execution Plan Request. Signature: "2.0"
Transport Execution Plan. Signature: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Details: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. UBL Version Identifier. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Customization Identifier. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Profile Identifier. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Carrier Assigned_ Identifier. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. UUID. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Issue Date. Date: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Issue Time. Time: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Name: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Description. Text: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Note. Text: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Shipping Order Identifier. Identifier: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Other_ Instruction. Text: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Consignment: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Document Reference: "2.0"
Transportation Status Request. Signature: "2.0"
Web Site Access. URI. Identifier: "2.0"
- this does not affect schema validity, so this is a non-material issue, so
no need to change the UBL 2.1 deliverables
- these values have been repaired in the UBL 2.2 model (they will point to
2.1) so that the new additions in UBL 2.2 can be checked for having the
correct value in this column
- it also seems that 59 items marked as coming from UBL 2.1 actually came
from earlier versions of UBL:
Mislabelled version number for old BIEs: 59
Address. Address Type Code. Code
Address. Address Format Code. Code
Address. Country Subentity Code. Code
Allowance Charge. Allowance Charge Reason Code. Code
Application Response. Version. Identifier
Application Response. Document Response
Bill Of Lading. UUID. Identifier
Certificate Of Origin. Version. Identifier
Classification Scheme. Note. Text
Contact. Name
Contact. Note. Text
Credit Note Line. Note. Text
Debit Note Line. Note. Text
Despatch Line. Note. Text
Goods Item. Identifier
Invoice Line. Note. Text
Item Comparison. Price Amount. Amount
Item Property. Name
Item Property. Value. Text
Line Item. Sales_ Order Identifier. Identifier
Line Item. Note. Text
Monetary Total. Allowance_ Total Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Charge_ Total Amount. Amount
Order Change. Customer_ Reference. Text
Order Change. Payment Means
Order Line. Note. Text
Order Reference. Sales_ Order Identifier. Identifier
Order Response. Customer_ Reference. Text
Order Response. Payment Means
Order. Customer_ Reference. Text
Order. Payment Means
Packing List. Version. Identifier
Party. Contact
Party. Person
Payment Terms. Payment Means Identifier. Identifier
Quotation Line. Note. Text
Receipt Line. Note. Text
Receipt Line. Oversupply_ Quantity. Quantity
Reminder Line. Note. Text
Remittance Advice Line. Note. Text
Request For Quotation Line. Note. Text
Response. Reference. Identifier
Response. Response Code. Code
Shipment. Details
Shipment. Consignment
Shipment. Origin_ Address. Address
Signature. Note. Text
Signature. Validator. Identifier
Signature. Signatory_ Party. Party
Statement Line. Note. Text
Statement Line. Balance Brought Forward_ Indicator. Indicator
Statement. Payment Means
Status. Condition Code. Code
Status. Reference Date. Date
Status. Reference Time. Time
Status. Description. Text
Status. Status_ Reason. Text
Status. Sequence Identifier. Identifier
Status. Text
- the UBL 2.2 model is being updated to reflect the values used in UBL 2.0
for the above entries
- many items labeled 2.0 actually come from 1.0 ... should we abandon the
1.0 values and simply change them to 2.0 so that all versions are from
the 2.x family?
- Ken will change all versions 1.x to be 2.0
JIRA tickets
https://issues.oasis-open.org/issues/?filter=12972 (note that the view can
be changed using the box icon at top right; the list view provides the most
summary information, without the detail view obscuring the screen space)
- when creating tickets, remember to distinguish the following components
by how they are described to be used as categories:
<https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:components-panel>https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:components-panel
- status and resolution values:
- NEW - the issue has been created but not yet agreed to be in
consideration or not for the development distribution
- DEFERRED - the issue is not in consideration for the development
distribution
- OPEN - the issue is in consideration for the development distribution
- RESOLVED + Applied - the issue is implemented in test but not released
- RESOLVED + Fixed - the issue is implemented in a released test version;
(record which one)
- RESOLVED + Cannot Reproduce - considered as no action for distribution
- APPLIED - the issue is included in a public review (record which one)
- see also the discussion on the status workflows here:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201606/msg00022.html
- members please note to discuss ticket issues as comments to the ticket so
that we can audit the discussion when making decisions about the ticket,
without having to find the discussion on the main mail list
UBL TC next steps
- what promotional issues need to be addressed?
- do we need a travelling road show along the lines of UBL International?
- can anyone volunteer to create more short video segments to be shared?
TC CONCALL SCHEDULE
Next meetings:
2016-07-20 Pacific 01:00UTC/21:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
2016-07-27 No UBL teleconferences
Proposed:
2016-08-03 No UBL teleconferences
2016-08-10 Pacific 01:00UTC/21:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
2016-08-17 Pacific 01:00UTC/21:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
2016-08-24 Pacific 01:00UTC/21:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
2016-08-31 Pacific 01:00UTC/21:00EDT, Atlantic 14:00UTC/16:00CEST/10:00EDT
Will anyone be requesting a leave of absence in the near future? For
privacy reasons, this discussion will be kept off of the minutes.
TC calendar:
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/calendar.php?wg_abbrev=ubl>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/calendar.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
TC calendar iCal subscription link:
<http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup_feeds/ical/my_vcalendar.ics?token=fa658a7994a6cefb10c10be09e139af3&workgroup_id=50>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup_feeds/ical/my_vcalendar.ics?token=fa658a7994a6cefb10c10be09e139af3&workgroup_id=50
OTHER BUSINESS
- none
--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training @US$45: http://goo.gl/Dd9qBK |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. _ _ _ _ _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G Ken Holman _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ blog _ _ _ _ _ http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/posts |
Legal business disclaimers: _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]