OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-50) Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63966#comment-63966 ] 

Roberto Cisternino commented on UBL-50:

Oh today I was not working cause here is an holiday, anyway I intended the sender as an initiator of the agreement. I think there is always an initiator either private or a body like OpenPEPPOL.
An agreement could be between parties (something like P2P), or between a party and its service provider (Access Point) and between service providers.
ParticipantParty is ok but how can I know who is the sender if I am using UBL without an envelope or even I don't use a business network and just P2P ?

Does it makes sense to keep the initiator as sender ?

InitiatorParty (1..0)
ParticipantParty (1..n)
GoverningParty (0..1) is ok (better than HubParty)

> Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?
> --------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: UBL-50
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documents and business objects
>            Reporter: Roberto Cisternino
>            Assignee: Roberto Cisternino
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: DigitalCapability, TPA
> I found the DigitalCapability document is quite close to a TPA (Trading Partner Agreeement) or more precisely to an e-TPA.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]