[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-55) Should new Tender Status Inquiry be Tender Status Enquiry
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=64291#comment-64291 ] Kees Duvekot commented on UBL-55: --------------------------------- we have a couple of current document that are also used to "ask" about the status of certain documents DocumentStatusRequest TransportProgressStatusRequest TransportationStatusRequest So maybe it will make more sense to name this document "Tender Status Request" instead of "Tender Status Inquiry/Enquiry" to bring it in line with current documents. What is the expected response document? TenderStatus? > Should new Tender Status Inquiry be Tender Status Enquiry > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: UBL-55 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-55 > Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Documents and business objects > Reporter: Ken Holman > Assignee: Ken Holman > > I think for consistency we need to change the name of this new document type from "Tender Status Inquiry" to be "Tender Status Enquiry". > Please let me know if there are any objections. > An easily overlooked issue ... we are supposed to be using Oxford English. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]