[OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-95) Response use of evidence

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=65845#comment-65845 ] 

Ole Madsen commented on UBL-95:
-------------------------------

16:This is no 16 in DG Grows new spreadsheet "The Evidence component should be aggregated to the root element of the schema instead of to the TenderingCriterionResponse.

Added Evidence on Root level - let us discuss what to delete.
 

> Response use of evidence
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: UBL-95
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-95
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documents and business objects
>            Reporter: Ken Holman
>            Assignee: Ole Madsen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Wouldn't it make sense having the evidences out the Response, at the root level? This way two or more responses could point at the one evidence that has been specified once (thus having more "generic" evidences).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)