Re: [ubl] Trying to understand DocumentReference from an implementer's perspective

["G. Ken Holman" <g.ken.holman@gmail.com>]

Okay ... that makes sense.  Thanks, Oriol.

So, for me that calls into question the 
definition for Attachment in the DocumentReference:

  "The referenced document as an attachment to 
the document from which it is referenced."

... since the referenced document isn't actually 
being attached, it is being pointed to.

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/os-UBL-2.1/mod/summary/reports/UBL-AllDocuments-2.1.html#Table_DocumentReference.Details

But I can live with it if I consider the 
Attachment in the abstract sense of a document 
logically attached, not physically attached.  So, okay.

But I believe this confusion further bolsters my 
contention we need the changes I've been pushing 
in ticket 
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-168 regarding the definitions.

Which we will talk about for UBL 2.3 ... I give 
up on the ticket for UBL 2.2.  I've just deferred it.

Thank you for your patience with this.  It hadn't 
yet come up in my implementation experience or I 
would have discussed it earlier.

. . . . . . Ken

At 2018-02-08 07:25 +0100, Oriol Bausà Peris wrote:
> Hi Ken
>
> I think you need to use the 
> cac:DocumentResponse/cac:DocumentReference/cac:Attachment/cac:ExternalReference/cbc:URI 
> in order to add the URI to the document being referenced.
>
>
> Best regards
> Oriol BausÃ
>
> > El 8 febr 2018, a les 4:58, G. Ken Holman 
> > <<mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> 
> > va escriure:
> >
> > Meanwhile, can someone please guide me where in 
> > a DocumentStatus document I am supposed to put 
> > the URI to the document I'm reporting the status of?


--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |