Subject: Re: [ubl] Putative voting documents for UBL 2.2 CSPRD03 for February 21, 2018
At 2018-02-15 18:28 +1100, Levine Naidoo wrote:
Looking at it for the first time and with a fresh pair of eye,
I think Section 2, 2nd Para should be amended, seems itâ??s a duplication of the same paragraph from the UBL 2.1 documentation - needs a summary highlighting the difference between 2.2 and 2.1
Agreed. I'll try to pull something together.
and consequently figure 2 should be adjusted to accommodate the new use cases.
Perhaps additional figures if someone on the committee is prepared to create them in time, but until then I'll adjust the text and the titles to indicate that the diagrams describe portions of UBL.
I do not have the bandwidth to create additional diagrams.Another option is to remove the diagrams entirely since they are no longer comprehensive. I'm leaning towards this final solution if there are no diagrams forthcoming. It might be better to not illustrate anything at all if what is illustrated is not complete.
Thanks, again, Levine! . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ | Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources | Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |