Re: [ubl] The 60 day public review for UBL 2.2 has closed

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

Thank you from all of us, Chet, for your assistance in these matters.

I agree the carbon copy message to the UBL 
Comment list on June 10 is unrelated to UBL 2.2.

. . . . Ken

At 2018-06-25 09:46 -0400, Chet Ensign wrote:
> Members of the UBL TC,Â
>
> As you know, the 60-day public review for UBL 
> 2.2 COS01 has closed. Although I see a comment 
> in the ubl-comment@ mailing list, it does not 
> read to me as connected to the public review but 
> rather a cc over from the ubl-dev list.Â
>
> Therefore my next step will be to start the 
> OASIS call for consent for OASIS Standard. You 
> can expect to see that ballot announced later today.Â
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.Â
>
> --
>
> /chetÂ
> ----------------
>
> Looking forward to 
> <https://us18.borderlesscyber.org/en/>Borderless 
> Cyber 2018, 3-5 Oct, Washington, D.C.
> Organized by The World Bank, OASIS, and Georgetown University
>
> Chet Ensign
> Chief Technical Community Steward
> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>http://www.oasis-open.org
>
> Primary: +1 973-996-2298
> Mobile: +1 201-341-1393Â


--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |