Proposed Agenda Item - affecting CR 002

[Tom Bellwood <bellwood@us.ibm.com>]

We've found what looks like another minor typo in the V3 spec.   See
attached for details.  I would propose that this item be added to the list
for CR 002 on typos.   Luc - please add to the next agenda.

Thanks,
Tom Bellwood       Phone:  (512) 838-9957 (external);   TL:  678/9957
(internal)
Co-Chair, OASIS UDDI Specification TC

---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Bellwood/Austin/IBM on 04/28/2003
03:16 PM ---------------------------

From:  Richard B Allen on 04/28/2003 11:05 AM

To:    Tom Bellwood/Austin/IBM
cc:    Anh Lu/Austin/IBM
Subject:


Tom,

It looks like the V3 spec incorrectly copied the caveats across all
delete_xxx API's. The text in red should not apply to delete_tModel since
tModels may be deleted (hidden) multiple times.

5.2.11.4 Caveats:
If an error occurs in processing this API call, a dispositionReport element
MUST be returned to
the caller within a SOAP Fault. See Section 4.8 Success and Error
Reporting. In addition to
the errors common to all APIs, the following error information is relevant
here:
· E_invalidKeyPassed: Signifies that one of the uddiKey values passed did
not match
with any known tModelKey values or multiple instances of the same tModelKey
values were passed. The invalid key references SHOULD be clearly indicated
in the
error text.

This was identified when a defect was returned. Currently our code rejects
multiple deletes of same tModel in one call.

Rick Allen
Lotus Notes: Richard B Allen/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Internet: rballen@us.ibm.com
(512) 838-3786,  t/l 678-3786