OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

uddi-spec message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Use of UDDI.org as a means of promoting TC, UBR, Std Groupand Consortium tModels and Value Sets








Luc & Claus - I like this so far.   I made a couple minor updates to this
page too...

(See attached file: tModel web site prototype.doc)

Thanks,
Tom Bellwood       Phone:  (512) 838-9957 (external);   TL:  678/9957
(internal)
Co-Chair, OASIS UDDI Specification TC
STSM - Emerging Technologies
IBM Corporation

"Von Riegen, Claus" <claus.von.riegen@sap.com> on 05/14/2003 05:28:16 AM

To:    "'Luc Clement'" <lclement@windows.microsoft.com>,
       uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject:    RE: [uddi-spec] Use of UDDI.org as a means of promoting TC,
       UBR,       Std Group and Consortium tModels and Value Sets




Luc,

Thanks  for your proposal. I believe that it is important and already well
structured.
I took  the liberty to work out the details of your Prototype page. Please
find an  updated page attached.

Claus
-----Original Message-----
From: Luc Clement  [mailto:lclement@windows.microsoft.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Mai  2003 02:45
To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:  [uddi-spec] Use of UDDI.org as a means of promoting TC, UBR, Std
Group and  Consortium tModels and Value Sets


(Apologies for my last and premature  mail)

A  few meetings ago, the topic of where to post non-normative tModels came
up in  a discussion; we never concluded this discussion. I'd like to revive
it and  obtain your input on the following.

Background
As some of you may know, during the course of the  v3 spec development, we
removed from the spec those tModels and value sets  that were not
considered appropriate to make normative in favour of having  the UDDI
Business Registry (UBR) to manage these. They include the  following:
1 UDDI Business Registry Value Set tModels:  Category System, Identifier
Systems and Categorization  Groups

1.1 North American Industry Classification System  (NAICS) 1997 Release
1.2 United Nations Standard Products and Services  Code System (UNSPSC)
Version 7.3
1.3 ISO 3166 Geographic Code System
1.4 ISO 3166 Code Derivation for Business Locations
1.5 ISO 3166  and UNSPSC Code Group System
1.6 World Geodetic System 1984
1.7  WGS 84 Latitude Code System
1.8 WGS 84 Longitude Code System
1.9  WGS 84 Altitude Code System
1.10 Geographic Precision Code System
1.11 UDDI Business Registry Postal Address Structure
1.12 Dun  & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number Identifier System
1.13 Thomas Register  Supplier Identifier Code System
1.14 ISO 6523 International Code  Designator (ICD) System

2 UDDI Business Registry Core  tModels

2.1  Domain Key Generator for the UDDI  Business Registry Domain
2.2  UDDI JIS X 4061 Japanese sortOrder  qualifier
The UBR's Operator's Council is currently in the  process of reviewing
these tModels in support of its UDDI v3 deployment  work. This topic is
long overdue.
TC, Standards Groups and  Consortium Needs
As we've discussed and continue to encounter, the  TC, other standards
groups and consortium need a place where they can  collect and promulgate
the existence of their tModels and value sets (e.g.  WSDL v2 TN, ebXML TN,
etc).
Proposal
The UBR Operator's Council is considering asking  the UDDI Steering
Committee to post UBR tModels on UDDI.org. At the same  time, the
OC discussed the need/desire for the TC/Consortium to  have a similar forum
and thought that we should consult the  TC.

To this end, the OC has created a prototype page to  be added to the
UDDI.org site; please find it attached. The prototype  suggests the
addition of a "Common tModels" navigation link which displays  the content
of the attached.

Please review this prototype. This matter will be  put on the agenda for
the next TC call.
Action Required
A. The OC is soliciting your support and  interest for this; while it can
proceed independently from the TC, it would  be best to coordinate this.

B. We need to discuss the criteria for what gets  published on the page; I
would expect the Steering Committee to be the gate  keeper but they would
require guidance from the TC on matter of  criteria

As a next step once we complete this discussion and  if the TC is
favourable to posting such information, the next step would be  for the TC
(and the OC) to make a request to the UDDI-SC asking for  this content to
be posted.

For your consideration.

Luc


Luc  Clément
Microsoft
Co-chair, OASIS UDDI Spec TC



=?ISO-8859-1?Q?tModel_web_site_prototype=2Edoc?=



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]