[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Re: question about WSDL/UDDI TN 2 (information missing from document)
None of these issues apply to the latest version. Admittedly, nobody but me has seen the latest version. J
Please note that we have not removed the “WSDL deployment” option, but it is now known as the “WSDL Implementation Document” option and is implemented differently so the tModels are no longer needed.
John Colgrave IBM
-----Original Message-----
Matt,
Thanks very much for your comments. I will forward them to the team.
I handed editorial control over to John Colgrave a few months back, and I must admit, I haven't perused the current document with a fine-toothed comb.
1. We did some redesign of the tModels near the end, and we did away with the WSDL URL Reference and WSDL URL tModels (originially they were designed to support a "WSDL deployment" option -- which would permit you to reference a WSDL document to obtain the access point of the service -- after considerable debate we elected to remove this option.) But it appears that John neglected to remove the references to the tModels in section 2.3.3.
2. These three tModels were the last ones we created, and John just didn't generate them before submitting the draft for review. They will be specified in the final document.
3. I'd say that this is a semantically irrelevant typo -- but I'll tell John to fix it. (As you same -- keyName is not semantically relevant)
4. You are correct -- but John hadn't generated the V2 keys...
Best regards, Anne
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]